that last question made me laugh, because YES i have disagreed with a supervisor because she was a no-good lying whore. i may have mentioned her on this blog, but the details were left out because i feared my job would be in danger. now that i have no job, i've got nothing to lose.
first of all, she was a manager in charge of all of the art instructors. it was her responsibility to train them, substitute when someone couldn't make it to a class, provide materials, sign timecards, and sell the program to new schools. she failed in every aspect, and with a sour look on her face while doing it. she received a call from an art instructor who suddenly fell ill and couldn't make it to her class. the manager's response was, "i would make it out there myself, but my hand is asleep." that wasn't a typo. once when the manager called in sick, she asked this same art instructor to go to a meeting for her and sell the program in her absence. another time when the manager was sick for 3 days in a row, i helped some of the other art instructors who needed it and she flipped out and started crying, saying i was a back-stabber.
do you want to know more? oh, it gets better. the one and only time she actually did substitute for an art instructor, she only covered the first 2 hours and made the instructor drive across town to catch the last hour because she didn't feel like doing all 3 hours herself. the teacher whose class she was in (the regular school teacher) complained that she was unprepared and couldn't control the classroom. in a meeting with the executive director, she lied about making changes to a test that i was disputing. she insisted i had the wrong version of the test and suggested that i missed the meeting where she gave ALL the art instructors copies of the updated version. i asked her for a copy of this updated version and she said no. twice! i asked the other art instructors if they had an updated version and they didn't. then i got in trouble for calling her a liar.
she never trained the new art instructors. they were sent into the classroom with zero training! no talking about the projects beforehand, no preparation for set-up or clean-up, no classroom management ideas - nothing. when we all told her this was why instructors were quitting, she was defensive, saying that she was soooo comfortable in the classroom that she assumed all of us were too. she also assumed that anyone with half a brain could read the lessons on paper and be able to teach the projects without help. after all of us told her in a meeting that we DO need help, she started crying.
the worst thing she did was change the tests in the first place. there were questions on the test that had nothing to do with what we taught in class. she was ok with this, explaining that those things that they don't know yet will be taught to them next year. so it's a good thing for kids to get low test scores because she planned to explain to school officials that their scores are low now, but when we come back next year, they will improve. ok, what school likes low test scores? what school would want us back the next year when their students didn't pass? what kind of teacher would give questions to students that would confuse them and make them feel like they should know the answer?
we had a display wall in the best place we could possibly have it- the office of education. how many teachers and educators go through that building? how many of them would see the museum's successful programs? a whoooole lot, and it had sat there for years. old art projects were in sad frames, the vinyl letters were peeling off of the walls. "resno Art Museum," it read. i told her it needed to be fixed and if she wanted me to do it, i'd be happy to. she basically told me to go away because she already knew about it. why would you know about this shitty wall space and not want to fix it? it was a golden wall! her excuse was that it costs money. not if you have the frames and the art ready to hang. it doesn't cost money to take down old stuff! "it most certainly does cost money," she told me, "because if we damage the walls, we will have to pay for it." number one, we won't damage the walls. number two, it was an art museum!! doesn't she know that there is plenty of spackle lying around?? 4 of us fixed it and it looked fantastic in the end, no thanks to her and her bad attitude.
i challenged her personally and also in front of the executive director. he did nothing to solve the problems and even defended her. "well, you don't know why she doesn't substitute," he said to me. "you're right, i don't know why, but it is on her job description."
and she had me written up for not respecting her.
i guess i just need to write all of this crap out to get it off my chest for good. this is my way of burying it and not complaining about it anymore. the quesiton in the interview sparked that whole chain of memories, which i used to replay in my head at night and wake up angry because my supervisor was a useless wench with a bad attitude. and i'm not afraid of what people say because hardly anyone reads this blog anyway, and it's more of a matter of getting it off my back and like i said, burying it. it's been bothering me too much and yeah, i know i sound like a complainer and unprofessional but it really did affect me. on weekends, i couldn't relax because i had her ugly attitude in my mind.
karma is a boomerang, though, because on her wedding day, during her first dance with her new


